Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/SK902.30.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(x) → xor(x, true)
implies(x, y) → xor(and(x, y), xor(x, true))
or(x, y) → xor(and(x, y), xor(x, y))
=(x, y) → xor(x, xor(y, true))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DirectTerminationProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(x) → xor(x, true)
implies(x, y) → xor(and(x, y), xor(x, true))
or(x, y) → xor(and(x, y), xor(x, y))
=(x, y) → xor(x, xor(y, true))

Q is empty.

We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

not₁ > [xor₂, true, and_2]
implies₂ > [xor₂, true, and_2]
or₂ > [xor₂, true, and_2]
=₂ > [xor₂, true, and_2]